Nextjs vs Gatsby

Which is better Next.js or Gatsby?

In case you are creating a complex internet site, one which handles personal information and has a few portions of custom–built content material, you should know frameworks such as WordPress. With speed turning into a crucial parameter to rating, more modern websites constructed as SSR(server-side-rendering) and SSG(static-site-generation) have become usual. Frameworks like Jekyll, Next.js, Gatsby, etc. are used to make websites more interactive and dynamic.

Gatsby.js and Next.js are the most used technologies, according to the feedback given by most of the developers. The decision has been very easy — If you are developing a static website(in which content doesn’t change regularly) then you should go with Gatsby.js. Similarly, if it is a complex website that needs mainly server maintenance, use next.

But over a period of time, these technologies have been updated a lot and because of this, it becomes hard for the developers to decide which one to use.

Next.JS?

To develop an SSR(server-side-render) website through which we create the HTML dynamic when ever new request comes to it through the server. Next.js is best for constructing dynamic websites. i.e., websites that are SSR(server-side-rendered).

With the help of features like single-file components, hot code reloading, automatic code-splitting, and many more in next.js, we can develop good websites that interact more with server.

Gatsby?

A programmer-friendly static site generator can be built by Gatsby that combines components of React-router, React, GraphQL. Gatsby generates static HTML files in an effort to load the site at once from a CDN. In Gatsby, we don’t need a server or a Database on queries inclusive of loading your weblog.

More than a static website generator, Gatsby is not considered a present-day framework(front-end) that gives noticeably fast loading web pages. It does this by the use of a group of capabilities consisting of asset optimization, server-facet rendering, records pre-fetching, code splitting, amongst others.

When to use which framework

Gatsby

We have pointed out what Gatsby is and some of the few similarities among next and gatsby. In this phase, we will show you a particular scenario wherein Gatsby glows.

A static internet site that includes a sequence of separate HTML pages, each page showcasing a bodily website. Unique customers visiting a static internet site will see equal content, and updates are not seen in real-time.
Example: a personal blog.

Because the wide variety of pages is predictable and the content material doesn’t change, Gatsby is best for developing this kind of website. Gatsby offers aid from an expansion of CMS structures, databases, rest APIs, and GraphQL.

The main difference between Gatsby and next.JS is the way they take care of data. Gatsby parts the website, which means that individuals of your group aside from developers can also edit the webiste, which could then be compiled because the web page throughout the runtime.

In the Gatsby framework, we can update data without coding knowledge which therefore makes gatsby a better option for building static websites.

Next.js

In case you are constructing a website with more than one customer developing user bills after commenting on the content material on the page, then next.JS would be a better option for you.

Those websites have a couple of users connect in at any instantaneous, making it not possible to construct a static internet site throughout the duration. The time taken by gatsby for creating this kind of website makes it a bad option.

For websites like this, you need to expose specific, dynamic content to logged-in users. SSR(server-side-render) will assist cater to special users based totally on authentication, and each person can see their content as quickly as they devise it at the internet site.

So on the floor, it looks like an easy preference —  static websites(simple to develop)-Gatsby(mostly recommended), and for big multi-user websites, use Next.  

Websites made with the help of next.js are as follows:-
1. Tiktok
2. InVision
3. Twitch(mobile version)
4. IGN

Websites made with the help of gatsby.js are as follows:-
1. Figma
2. Airbnb
3. Nike
4. Send Grid

Go check out our Solidity course, click here!

Similarities?

Experience: both next and gatsby include huge documentation that helps in creating functions over a present application. If you know basic react which is needed for both of these frameworks, you don’t need to learn everything.

Performance: both next and gatsby can be applied to construct excessive–overall performance websites with very good Lighthouse rankings, if built properly. The websites are search engine optimization friendly considering the fact that each gives pre-rendered HTML.

Features: warm “reloading” is a function that most builders like, and bith Gatsby and Next include warm Reloading out-of-the-container. Many other features that are included in next.js and gatsby.js are prefetching, routing, caching, code splitting, etc.

All the above points about the next.js and gastby.js signify that both frameworks are important and both have their pros and cons.
Thank You for reading. If you have any queries or suggestions, do let us know in the comments! Check out the courses on Codedamn. You can also practice coding in the Codedamn playgrounds. Join the Codedamn developers community and interact with fellow learners.