Resolving the self destruct issue
Created by Kshitij about a year ago
No description provided
Shouldn't be easier & also will save gas to just revert() the transaction in the fallback() instead of re-sending the Ethers via a transfer() function?
can we transfer those balance (at 3:20) to buyer's account instead of manager's account??
why did we use _; is modifier?
What is the use of listen on all transactions in remix ide. Is it of any use? Should we keep it check or uncheck?
can we require statements without function?
In the code after resolving the self destruct issue, the contract will not be destroyed, it will just not execute any function if destroyed= true, right?